New single coffee makers

Jamie Kim

Contributing Writer and Analyst

Jamie Kim is a consumer products expert with over 17 years of experience in areas of product development and manufacturing. She has held leading roles at both mid-size consumer goods companies and one of the most notable and largest apparel brands in the world. Jamie has contributed to several of the GH Institute Labs, including Kitchen Appliances, Media and Tech, Textiles and Home Appliances. In her free time she enjoys cooking, traveling, and working out.

Best single-serve coffee makers 2023

Content is created by CNN Underscored’s team of editors who work independently from the CNN newsroom. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more

Reviews

What's in this guide

• Best overall single-serve coffee maker: Breville-Nespresso VertuoPlus
• Best budget single-serve coffee maker: Sboly Single Serve Coffee Maker Brewer
• How we tested
• Other single-serve coffee machines we tested

As long-time coffee drinkers, we didn’t think it was possible to be overly caffeinated. A few cups in the morning, a pick-me-up cold brew mid-afternoon, maybe a post-dinner cappuccino — we may not be at “Gilmore Girls” consumption levels, but we’re at least in the Stars Hollow neighborhood.

But after running 10 single-cup coffee makers through a battery of tests (more on that below) — and drinking multiple cups from each machine multiple times — we found ourselves staying up extra late watching reruns of Lorelai and Rory on Netflix, and eventually, drifting off to sleep with coffee pods, ideal temperatures and drip times invading our dreams.

The good news: The occasional jitters were well worth it, as they put two winning machines on our radar that we highly recommend you, in turn, put on your kitchen counters:

Breville-Nespresso VertuoPlus

Best overall single-serve coffee maker

Nespresso VertuoPlus Deluxe by Breville

The Breville-Nespresso VertuoPlus, uses pods that deliver both espresso and “regular” coffee, could simply not be beat for its convenience. Intuitive and a snap to use right out of the box, it looks sleek on the counter, contains a detached 60-ounce water reservoir so you don’t have to refill it with each use and delivers perfectly hot, delicious coffee with a simple tap of a lever and press of a button.

$183.95 $119 at Amazon $199.95 $157.24 at Walmart $189.99 at Bed Bath & Beyond

Sboly Single Serve Coffee-Brewer

Best budget single-serve coffee maker

Sboly Single Serve Coffee Maker Brewer

For best value, we found ourselves smitten with the Sboly Single-Serve Coffee Brewer. One of the lower priced machines we tested, it scored big points for its compact size and ease of use, but especially for its ability to brew four different sizes using either grounds or K-cups — an option we really appreciated.

$79.99 $46.99 at Walmart

Serious java junkies tend to avoid single-serve makers, lamenting that pods will never result in the same great taste you get from a lovingly prepared, precisely honed pour-over method. While it’s true many single-cup coffee makers may not produce the robustness of a moka pot or French press, nor the flavorful pots of drip makers, our top two served up some boldly delicious brews.

Both delivered fast, hot coffee that consistently tasted the way it should (meaning, there were no flavors that shouldn’t be there, and they were neither burnt nor weak-tasting), and they were each extremely easy to set up and operate. They both also featured a unique X-factor that tipped the scales, from sheer handiness to valued versatility and amazing taste.

Nespresso by Breville VertuoPlus Deluxe Coffee and Espresso Maker Bundle With Aeroccino

If you’re in the market for a coffee machine that can brew a consistently great cup that’s piping hot, makes espresso, is extremely easy to use and looks great on your counter, you need the Nespresso VertuoPlus in your life.

This single-cup coffee maker stood out from the pack in nearly every category. It produced the hottest coffee of the bunch, delivered the same great taste with every cup, allowed for a variety of brewing options and truly could not be easier to use.

Now, that consistency, of course, is partly owed to its use of Nespresso — specifically, Nespresso VertuoPlus — pods. The big pluses of the pods are that you are always guaranteed a great cup of coffee, no guessing or experimenting with ground amount or timing (and no need for an additional coffee grinder at all). The pods accommodate five cup sizes — espresso (1.35-ounce), double espresso (2.7-ounces), gran lungo (5-ounces), coffee (8-ounces) and alto coffee (14-ounces). They also come in 27 flavor options, from a highly intense double espresso for those mornings you need jet fuel to get you moving to medium roasts just right for a mid-morning pick-me-up to flavored coffees perfect for blending with milk for an afternoon latte.

And thanks to a clever barcode design, the machine reads each capsule, so the user doesn’t have to worry about changing up any settings; just pop the pod in, tap a button, wait 90 seconds for it to do its thing and you’re done.

In addition to the different sizes, you can also choose from a wide range of blends. The machine comes with a starter pod variety pack ranging from espresso to lattes in an array of flavor intensity.

So, here are the minuses of pods: They aren’t cheap. A 40-count variety pack is $40 on Amazon. That, of course, is less expensive than picking up an espresso every morning at your neighborhood coffee shop, but you’re locked in to using Nespresso Vertuo line only. By comparison, K-cups, used in Keurigs and other pod-friendly machines, are readily available at pretty much any supermarket or big box store, but when quality triumphs over ease of use, Nespresso pods edge out the competition. We also found Nespresso delivers a much richer, darker-roast and more flavorful taste than traditional K-cups (true coffee connoisseurs will also look for the brand’s special partnerships with global coffee producers and limited edition blends.)

And while Nespresso does offer a recycling program (the pods are aluminum), it does require some work on your part: You’ll need to collect them in the included recycling bag (or request a free one), then drop them at a collection center, Nespresso store, post office or UPS store.

Pods aside, the machine is our winner because it’s just so easy to use. If there’s water in the tank, you simply tap the lever, insert your chosen pod and tap the sole button on top. The next time you use it, the pod is ejected into a receptacle (it holds 10) so there’s no need to walk the used one over to the trash until it’s full.

It also looks super sweet on your counter. The slim, minimalist, modern look takes up very little rof your precious counter space, and thoughtful design features — including an adjustable water tank that can be moved to rest to the right, left or behind the machine — allows you to make it fit best in your space. Unlike nearly every other model tested, it also comes in multiple colors — black, white and silver — and is sturdier and more durable than most of the other machines.

In short, if staying stocked up on pods and taking an extra step or two to recycle don’t turn you off, you like the option of brewing an espresso if you wish, and you value your time in the morning, this machine belongs on your counter.

Sboly Single-Serve Coffee Maker Machine With Thermal Mug

Our first thought as we unboxed this petite machine: “How cute!” But while the Sboly is, indeed, compact, it packs an impressive punch, most notably for its versatility.

We love that the machine allows you to brew 6-, 8-, 10- and 14-ounce cups using either ground coffee or K-cup pods — just swap out the grounds basket (no need for a paper filter) or pod basket depending on your choice and push a button to select “capsule” or “ground.” Within three minutes for grounds and 2 1/2 minutes for pods, you have a great-tasting cup of coffee. Of course, when using grounds, a little experimentation needs to take place in order to get the flavor to your liking depending on the size you choose. We found the recommended amount resulted in coffee on the weak side, so we added more the next time to get it to our liking. We also noted that coffee brewed in our 14-ounce travel mug tasted the same — and was just as hot — as that brewed at the smaller cup sizes.

The water receptacle needs to be filled with each use, but easy-to-read water lines make it a cinch to do (we do recommend pouring from a spout as the tank is, you guessed it, small). And to launch the machine’s self-cleaning process, just depress both buttons at the same time.

The coffee itself didn’t quite rise to the same temperature of our other winners, and since it’s made of plastic, the housing definitely is less durable. But for those who have limited counter space or are looking to add their own personal coffee machine to their cubicle or office (practically a must, post-pandemic, right?), this little guy is a wonderful fit.

So, yeah, there are other machines available that will do fancier things and will likely stand up longer to wear and tear. But for just under $60, the Sboly will keep you well-caffeinated, allow you to switch between grounds and pods, depending on what’s in your pantry, and is so small you can easily stash it away. Just be prepared to pull it out often — this is a machine you’ll love using again and again.

We spent several weeks testing these single-cup coffee makers, evaluating each brewer based on overall function, durability, ease of setup and breakdown, aesthetics and included warranty — all areas important to consumers.

Each coffee maker was tested at least three times, using the same grounds for ground-based machines, the same K-cups for pod-based machines and Nespresso pods for the Nespresso machine. When a machine featured both ground and pod options, both were tested.

We took extensive notes to capture a plethora of details from each machine, including everything from how hot it made the coffee and brew time to user-friendliness, everyday durability and how much counter space it required. We looked at how easy the machines were to clean, our first impressions based on looks, whether it comes in multiple colors and warranty terms.

Many of these single-cup coffee machines were excellent, producing hot coffee quickly. However, some shined in certain testing areas, putting them at the head of the class. Read on for our pros and cons, as well as the criteria breakdowns we used in our evaluations.

• Optimum temperature: According to the National Coffee Association, the optimum temperature for freshly brewed coffee is typically 180-185 degrees. Using that standard we measured the temperature of each cup using a food thermometer, rating each machine on its heat.
• Quality of brew: We noted how the coffee tasted after being brewed, including whether it was overly bitter or weak, if flavors or acidity existed that shouldn’t be there, and whether too much — or not enough — heat impacted its taste.
• Compatibility: We assessed whether the machine could be used with coffee pods or grounds (or both) as well as what filters, if any, were required. We also noted whether pods and filters were readily available, budget-friendly and eco-friendly.
• Brew time: We pulled up our stopwatch app to keep track of how long it took to brew the coffee, with shorter brew times scoring more points.
• User-friendliness: From unboxing and setup to brewing, cleaning and storing away, we took notes on how easy each machine was to use, including the value of the included instructions, whether the design was intuitive or overly complicated, how many buttons and settings were included and whether they were helpful or too much, and how easy the water tanks were to read and fill.
• Serving size: The machines ranged from being able to deliver one cup to a whole pot. For each device, we noted how many cups of coffee each one made, how many options were available, how much water the reservoir could hold and whether it required being refilled for each use.
• Brewing options: We looked at the number of brewing options available, including whether the machine offered just a basic brew, or if other options, such as single espresso shots, lattes, iced brews or tea, were also available.
• The mess factor: No one wants coffee stains on their counter, so we assessed how much splatter or extra dripping occurred during brewing.

• Everyday durability/signs of damage: For this category, we noted how easy or difficult each coffee machine was to set up, whether its parts felt sturdy or weak, and if standard brewing could cause any damage to the parts.
• Build quality: We observed the materials each brewer was constructed of — metal, plastic, ceramic — and the tangible feel of the parts and materials, as well as their general heft.
• Serviceability: We made notes on the ease of opening and taking apart each machine, should parts need to be replaced or serviced.

• Ease of assembly: We assessed the time it took to unbox each machine, how many minutes it took to read directions and assemble, and steps required besides the usual washing with soapy water and initial water-only brew cycle.
• Size: We noted the counter space needed for each coffee maker and whether they could be easily stored away in a cupboard or cabinet.
• Ease of cleanup: After testing each single-cup coffee machine, we observed how easy the cleaning process was, including cleaning filters, removing pods and washing parts, including drip trays and water reservoirs — and also noting whether they were easily removable or attached to the machine.

• First impression: We recorded our first impressions of each coffee maker, noting the appeal of the design, how nice it would look as a permanent resident of our kitchen counter or office space, and overall general appeal.
• Color options: We researched whether each machine came in multiple finishes or colors besides the standard black.
• Warranty: We noted the number of years of warranty for each machine.

If the teens in our house were choosing the winner, they would have gone with this slick and nifty model based solely on the fact that it makes whipping up a latte — hot or cold — not only easy, but fun. The K-Cafe will take up a lot of space on your counter, but if you like cappuccinos and lattes as much as a regular cup o’ joe, it may be well worth it.

The machine has a lot of going for it: The large, 60-ounce detachable water reservoir means you don’t have to refill it with each use, the machine is compatible with all K-cups and is extremely easy to use (pop in your pod, choose from 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-ounce or shot sizes, select strong if you like, and push “coffee” or “latte & capp. ” About 45 seconds later: Coffee! To froth the milk, add it to the dishwasher-safe metal frother, select “latte” or “capp” and “cold” if you want iced coffee, and let it whirl. So what nudged this high-performer out of the winner’s circle? The Nespresso was easier to use, smaller and seemed more durable. We also prefer the robust flavor of Nespresso pods compared to those of K-cups. But for honorable mention? This gets our vote.

There is a lot to like about this coffee maker. First, it’s different from the other models we tested, as it allows you to brew a full 12 cups that you can access throughout the day, perfect for those who like to space their caffeine breaks out a bit. The machine keeps coffee hot for four hours, and features a unique and lever you push to dispense your desired amount. A clever “coffee gauge,” like a fuel gauge, lets you know how much coffee is left (pointing from empty to full). And for those who just want a cup or two? Just add the amount of water and coffee grounds you want. If the heat of your coffee is important, this is your machine: It scored among the highest of all the machines we tested. It also scored high on taste, though it took us a few tries to dial in the right amount of grounds-to-water ratio.

Now, for brew time: If you’re opting for the full 12 cups, it takes as long as you’d expect a standard machine to take. It also took a lot longer than the other machines to assemble — we had to unpeel about a dozen stickers, remove paper inserts and there was a lot of plastic wrap involved. It’s also big — the size of a standard machine. So if space and convenience are of big import, this might not be your first choice. But if you like to sip your coffee throughout the day, or frequently host visitors who like to sip while they chat, it’s worth considering.

Let’s start with the positive: If you’re short on space (say, sharing a dorm room, studio apartment or are looking for a personal coffee maker for your office), this machine takes up a scant amount of room. Besides its tiny size, it also comes with a travel mug, and for those on a tight budget, rang up as the least expensive of the testing bunch. The AdirChef also delivers a really hot cup o’ joe — one of the hottest, in fact, of all the candidates we looked at, but not as hot the Nespresso or Cuisinart on Demand. It was easy as pie to assemble, which basically entailed just lifting the machine from box to counter and plugging in.

But where it really falls behind is durability. It’s extremely lightweight (read; not sturdy) and made of plastic. While the travel mug has a stainless steel facade, it’s also plastic on the inside (you won’t want to swap it for your trusted Yeti, in other words). So, for hot coffee at a really low price? Sure. Will it last you for years to come? Not likely.

Just like its “classic” name, this is just a good, basic, single-cup coffee brewer. It’s made of plastic and looks like your typical coffee maker. Not ugly, not fancy. But it scored high points for speed (we clocked it at a mere 48 seconds), high coffee temperature, the option of three brew sizes (6-, 8- and 10-ounce) and an easy-to-access, removable 48-ounce water tank. Size-wise, this Keurig landed on the larger end of the spectrum. Looks-wise, again, it was average. And, as far as ease of assembly, it was a piece of cake (lift out of box, remove stickers, rinse the water tank and go). Using it is simple: Add your pod, select your cup size and watch it go. In sum: This is a good, solid choice, but nothing to get too excited over.

If you’re looking for a bare-bones, entry-level, single-cup coffee maker that’s small enough to be easily tucked into a cabinet, you might consider this model. The budget conscious will appreciate that it simply calls for a few scoops of grounds, no paper filter necessary, to brew up an 8- or 14-ounce cup of coffee. It doesn’t come out super hot — at 152 degrees, it actually produced the least hot of all the machines we tested — but it’s really easy to use. Just fill your 8- or 14-ounce mug or travel cup with water, dump it in the reservoir and push the brew button. Now, that attached water reservoir is small, so be prepared for some splashing as you pour your water in (but you won’t see any coffee splashes — we sure didn’t notice any). And while it’s fast, brewing a cup in just two minutes, the coffee flavor was a bit on the weak side. In a sentence: It’s a good machine, but not outstanding.

After totaling up the scores of all the machines we tested, this Mr. Coffee version fell right in the middle. At under $100, we liked the price. It scored points for durability — it felt sturdier than other plastic models — and set up — it couldn’t have been easier to use straight out of the box. We liked the dial that allowed you to choose from 6-, 8-, 10-, or 12-ounce quantities and that you could fill the large, 72-ounce water reservoir so you don’t have to add water to it with each cup brewed. But the rest? Well, most everything else was average. The coffee tasted as it should, if perhaps a bit on the weak side. It only allows for a basic brew, only uses grounds and No. 2 cone filters are recommended. It’s big in size — equivalent to a standard machine. The coffee was on the low-end of the heat tests we performed. And its looks? Basic black. Our take: It’s a fine machine at a good price. But we tested better models.

Straight out of the gate, this coffee maker was a true contender for our winner’s circle. The first use yielded piping hot coffee, we loved that it allowed for both grounds and K-cups, and it included useful programmable settings including a choice of five quantity options, a rinse cycle and hot water button, and an easy-to-clean detached water reservoir. But as we fired it up to make a second cup the next morning, it started to whir, but quickly stopped, showing an “EEO” error on its digital display. We consulted the troubleshooting section of the manual and were alarmed when we read the answer was to call customer service. We called and were told to leave it unplugged for 24 hours so it could reset, and then it should work. We did that. The next day: same error. We called again and were told the machine had likely been dropped or “tapped too hard,” neither of which were done on our watch (perhaps during the shipping process?), resulting in a faulty tube and that it would need to be replaced. So, sadly, we had to disqualify this machine.

For those willing to pay a premium to fuel their caffeine habit, our former luxury pick was the Moccamaster Technivorm Cup One (not currently available). Stylishly elegant, it comes with a pretty ceramic cup and uses a copper brewing element to deliver a hot, scrumptious cup every time. It only uses grounds, but the best-tasting coffee came from this model.

Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing:

Note: The prices above reflect the retailers' listed price at the time of publication.

Thanks for subscribing! Your welcome email is on its way.

Receive product recommendations, reviews & deals several times a week.

By subscribing, you agree to our privacy policy

Internet: Internet and mass media: Lenta.ru

Recently, not only computers and smartphones are connected to the Internet - more and more washing machines, toasters, coffee makers and refrigerators are equipped with network access to make life easier for their owners. A smart air conditioner can be remotely asked to cool the apartment in advance, and a smart dishwasher can start the process of washing dishes. But vulnerabilities in the software of these devices are actively used by attackers. Lenta.ru tells how such systems can disrupt the operation of an entire segment of the global network.

On October 21, 2016, many major Internet services were unavailable in the United States. The social network Twitter, the streaming service Netflix, the Amazon online store, and other well-known sites “lay. ” Unknown attackers who attacked the servers of the hosting company Dyn, in fact, turned off the Internet for several hours throughout the East Coast of the States.

A huge number of hacked devices simultaneously sent terabytes of useless data to the servers of these sites, thus paralyzing their work. Similar attacks for hosting companies are commonplace, but this time the scale of the problem and a few surprises were unusual. In addition to the fact that the American authorities habitually considered Russian hackers to be the initiators of the attack, it involved not ordinary computers, but Internet of Things devices: smart cameras, routers, set-top boxes, and even toasters.

How did they get hacked and connected to the botnet? There are such a huge number of devices connected to the Internet that the chances of being attacked (especially successful) for a single one of them are extremely small. The Atlantic correspondent Andrew McGill decided to conduct an experiment: to see how soon they would try to break into his smart toaster.

Bait Toaster

For his experiment, McGill rented an Amazon virtual server and disguised it in such a way that it looked like a poorly protected device on the network, asking for a username and password when connecting to it. In reality, it was impossible to log into it, but the server logged the IP address of the computer trying to log in, and the information entered by it.

McGill thought that after launching the decoy attack, he would have to wait several days, but after 40 minutes someone tried to break into his car. Of course, this was not a person, but a bot that guesses the most commonly used standard passwords that equipment manufacturers set by default. The next attempt followed ten minutes later, and after about the same period of time they were repeated in the future.

Hacker bots were able to break into a weakly protected toaster in just 40 minutes

A still from the Mr. Robot series

McGill notes that his experiment was not clean, as he placed his virtual toaster on an Amazon server whose IP range is known, which means that they are attacked more often. Nevertheless, now hacker bots can scan at least the entire Internet - after all, they have the power of a huge number of hacked devices at their disposal, and each new device allows the botnet to scan more efficiently.

Mirai

The botnet used for the October 21st attack is called Mirai, and it really specializes mainly in non-standard devices connected to the Internet, from TVs to refrigerators. Why is it profitable for hackers to hack them? The computing power of such systems is small, and the software is specialized, but IoT devices are much easier to hack, since most of their creators do not even consider it necessary to complicate the development cycle and implement seemingly useless functions to protect a refrigerator or toaster from hackers.

Factory names and passwords used to access such devices have long been known to attackers. The October 21st attack shows where such neglect leads, says PenTestPartners, a UK-based information security consultancy, in a statement. “We have said many times that the Internet of Things will give rise to ideal botnets: these devices are easy to compromise, difficult to patch, and their owners are unlikely to ever guess about hacking,” the firm warns.

The first sign

The attack that brought the American Internet to its knees is not the first incident involving the Mirai botnet. The first time his power fell on the website of Internet security expert, journalist Brian Krebs, who has repeatedly spoken about the possibility of using the Internet of things for such attacks. Most likely, a certain hacker, having read his articles, wrote the Mirai code, and then decided to play an evil trick on Krebs.

This DDoS attack involved two Mirai-based botnets, each consisting mostly of webcams, the vulnerability of which is well known to attackers. Its scale at that time was a record: in total, about one and a half million devices took part in it, and the traffic volume was 660 gigabits per second.

It is important to note that a typical DDoS attack is carried out through the use of compromised servers, which generate several "garbage" (meaningless) requests for each incoming data packet, thus constantly increasing their number.

Hackers can actively use the vulnerability of household appliances already purchased by users

A frame from the Black Mirror TV series

Mirai behaves differently. Most of the requests that are sent by hacked IoT devices are direct, single and have a specific meaning, there are just a lot of attacking instances in this case. That is why the traffic they generate is extremely difficult to filter.

No exit

The Mirai botnet hacked devices using the Telnet remote access protocol. But do not think that if you turn it off and come up with some protection measures, then the attackers will not find another loophole. Unfortunately, it is simply impossible to close all the holes in software security today. Hackers will find them, hack them and use them. Since we are talking about uncontrolled devices, the owners of which are not going to mess with them, changing firmware and passwords, then once a hole is discovered, it will remain in them forever.

New models of smart kettles, thermostats and coffee makers will be protected from Mirai attacks, but vulnerable to attacks from more modern botnets. Unlike popular computer operating systems, most of which almost force users to update security protections, the average owner of a smart device is unlikely to consider updating the firmware of his kettle.

PenTestPartners are urging manufacturers of such devices to introduce a more aggressive patching process, but this is unlikely to solve the problem in the foreseeable future. Few people change their washing machine, refrigerator or toaster more than once every five years: these things last a long time. Their software, by definition, has more than one or two vulnerabilities, and sooner or later the ubiquitous hackers will discover this.

SINGLE VACUUM MATTRESSES | Furniture for the home

1. Merkandi
2. Base of offers
3. Furniture
4. Furniture for home
5. SINGLE VACUUM MATTRESSES