Home » Misc » Cost of backyard renovation

Cost of backyard renovation


Backyard Renovation Cost: This Is How to Calculate It | Architectural Digest

Messner says that working with hills or slopes instead of leveling them can save cash, as can shopping for native plants. “Using aggregate materials, like gravel or decomposed granite, is a great way to save on paving costs too,” he adds.

Determining different “rooms” in your yard should help you to figure out where to spend the most money. “You may have a costly drainage issue that is a top priority, as an example, so to compensate you can play with medium price points for the hardscape,” Anne says. “Design with less expensive materials where possible, and intersperse more expensive accents throughout. This allows for a budget-conscious design without appearing that way.”

You need a design phase

As much as you might want to immediately put a shovel to work, every expert suggests following a thorough plan first. “It doesn’t cost much to edit a blueprint, compared with editing a construction site after something goes wrong,” Anne says. “With proper design, planning, and engineering, a construction project can be quite exciting, predictable, and enjoyable.” This plan will also help you narrow down what your yard can actually accommodate.

“The biggest cost drivers for outdoor renovations are pools, retaining walls, slopes, and demolition,” Lenhart notes. “It’s useful to account for the most expensive features first, and then work your way down to more cost-effective design elements. Understanding the rough cost of big ticket items like decks, retaining walls, or kitchens helps you to figure out which features will deliver the most value to you. Ideally, you want to spend your budget on features that will have the greatest impact on your design.” Yardzen makes this process a cinch with an online quiz, but an in-person pro will run you through the costs before ever breaking ground. It’s also possible to complete this project in more than one phase, which would account for seasonality and provide more time to save.

“Phasing is key,” Anne says. “For example, if the pergola you want needs to be done in phase two, then make sure you install the footings needed now under phase one.”

Spaces should have more than one use

Your design should capitalize on flexibility, particularly if you’re short on space and budget. “Design spaces that can adapt to multiple uses: Entertaining, relaxation, dining, play,” Lenhart says. “Keeping boundaries between spaces broad and open, minimizing barriers within spaces, and leaning on movable furnishings goes a long way toward achieving this.”

Don’t be shocked by the cost of nixing rocks

Removing things that don’t fit your vision can be expensive. “Clients are most often surprised by the cost of demolition, including concrete, stumps, rocks, and boulders,” Messner says. “Access to the yard and grading can also add unexpected expenses.” To help ensure that costs are accounted for as much as possible, keep a checklist. “Our firm has a series of checklists during the design, estimating, and construction phases,” Anne says. The checklist encompasses the scope of each construction bid and all of the possibilities inherent to that scope.

Anne also says that working with one design firm lessens the chance of potential miscommunications, which can lead to costly mistakes. But on the bright side, issues can often be spotted immediately. “Most aspects of landscaping projects are visible to the eye, rather than an interior wall that may contain old electrical, plumbing, or mold,” she notes.

If you invest in one thing, make it trees

Lenhart recommends investing in trees—particularly ones that are native to your area—to get the best return on your investment. “They offer a ton of functional benefits, like habitat provision, improved infiltration and soil health, and even reduced home energy expenditure,” he says. “From a design experience perspective, they’re just as valuable. Trees make key focal points, can help lengthen sight lines, define outdoor rooms, and lend purpose to awkward nooks.” They can also supply more privacy and shade in years to come.

But you don’t have to be as enthusiastic about investing in plants. “Installing fewer plants is fine,” Anne says. “If you work in enough layers, varying heights, contrast of foliage colors, and plants that will grow over time, then I would embrace the sparseness.”

The Real Costs to Build 5 Different Backyard Retreats

Learn More

Whether for your own personal enjoyment, to help your family spread out, or even if you're just thinking of increasing the value of your house, crafting a more permanent place of respite outdoors can be worth the investment it takes to do it right.

According to KV Harper, founder and principal of Kex Design + Build in New Orleans, the biggest considerations for a backyard renovation are how you plan to use it and what your budget is. The cost for a backyard remodel can vary greatly, with total spend averaging anywhere from a couple thousand dollars for basic landscaping to more than $40,000. For bigger budget projects that can creep into the $20,000 range, like adding an outdoor kitchen, consider a Discover® personal loan (which allows for flexible repayment terms for all loan amounts of 36 to 84 months) to help cover the costs.

Getting inspired? Here are a few ideas to consider.

A Low-Maintenance Retreat

“If you don't think you'll be up for much maintenance, then a design utilizing mostly hardscape would be the better option,” says Harper. This doesn’t mean turning your yard into a barren expanse of concrete, but it does mean you should avoid grass and a lot of flower beds. Instead, opt for a patio and walkway, with a few planters potted with low-maintenance grasses and shrubs.

A small DIY pathway or patio can be constructed for less than $1,000 with materials from a big box retailer. Professional installation adds $5 to $15 per square foot, and higher-end materials, such as flagstone will also bump up the cost. Pea gravel or a similar material is the most cost-efficient. “I really like crushed granite as an inexpensive hardscape that can provide a nice clean backdrop for furniture,” Harper says.

If you have children or pets and don’t want to deal with mowing the lawn, artificial turf is an option, though it can be expensive, at $5 to $20 per square foot, compared to $0.90 to $2 for sod.

Transform the Shed

Sheds are often under-utilized. Instead of using it as a place where rusty garden tools and old bicycles go to die, transform it into useful real estate. A small shed can easily accommodate an art studio, a reading lounge, a playroom, or even a daybed for overnight guests. There are literally thousands of models on the market, many designed to look like miniature houses, complete with porches.

A small shed can easily accommodate an art studio, a reading lounge, a playroom, or even a daybed.

If you aren't wiring for electricity, or concerned about climate control, the only real cost is buying a shed that comes with at least one window to let in light. These can be found at home improvement retailers and big box stores for a couple thousand dollars.

Running electricity and insulating the shed so that you can use it when the weather is hot or cold adds a few hundred dollars to the budget. The average cost of installing insulation is $0.64 - $1.19, so for a 100-square-foot shed, it would be around $120. Hiring an electrician is $50 to $100 an hour.

Create a Culinary Experience

Dining al fresco on warm evenings is the best part of summer. Adding an outdoor kitchen and dining room can be a dream come true for many home cooks, but they can be expensive, costing up to $21,000 (or much more for a luxury setup).

Maintenance and weather should be key considerations when thinking about the design. “One of the first things to consider for an outdoor kitchen is the weather,” notes Harper. “Outdoor kitchens can get hot, so you want to design to accommodate shading either naturally or with a pergola.”

Maintenance and weather should be key considerations when thinking about outdoor kitchen design.

For the grill, Harper recommends gas over charcoal because it is easier to maintain and clean. She adds that you will want “a durable heat-resistant stone for the flooring and countertops.” Natural stone is one of the priciest materials you can choose, at $25 to $45 per square foot, but will hold up much better than cheaper options like stucco or manufactured stone.

Other add-ons that can increase your budget include plumbing for a sink, a built-in grill, refrigeration, or special features, such as a pizza oven or fireplace.

Build an At-Home Spa

With many self-care businesses still closed, some DIYers are creating spa-like retreats in their own backyards. And it can actually be quite affordable, when compared to a major project like an outdoor kitchen. A prefab sauna that seats four averages$2,800,$3,500

while you can expect to pay for a typical residential hot tub.

Add native plants and grasses around a sauna or hot tub for ambiance and privacy, or consider a pergola with curtains for an even more secluded escape. If either is too much of a commitment, you can achieve spa vibes by adding a small fire pit or chiminea, a water feature, and fragrant flowering vines or shrubs such as lavender.

Make Small Mighty

Related Story

Don't let limited real estate stifle your dreams. Harper designs a lot of small backyards, and she always focuses on making the space multi-functional.

“I think the easiest way to transform a small yard is to create a design that maximizes space by using built-in seating or dining,” she says, which is something she did in her own backyard. “I recently added a small deck to replace the stairs from our kitchen to the backyard. It was less expensive than doing a wide deck, and now the deck functions as stairs and a place to relax.”

She adds that light landscaping with hardscape materials is another inexpensive way to transform a yard. Think a pea gravel and paver patio combined with native plants that will thrive in the existing condition. In other words, if your yard only gets a few hours of sun, don’t waste space trying to grow a vegetable garden.

A design that maximizes small spaces? Built-in seating or dining, says Harper.

A Note on Buying Outdoor Furniture

For any backyard transformation, be sure to budget for furniture. A small patio can be outfitted for less than $1,000, but a full outdoor living and dining room set up will be significantly more. Harper recommends waiting until prices drop to invest in new pieces. “I know it’s hard, but try to buy outdoor furniture at the end of the season when it goes on sale. Most big box retailers put outdoor furniture on sale at a deep discount around the first week of August,” she says.

60 Backyard Ideas That'll Transform Your Space Into Paradise

Follow House Beautiful on Instagram.

Mistakes in making decisions on the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account: a thematic video consultation and overhaul of apartment buildings in the city of Moscow.

Thematic video consultation is devoted to how homeowners in an apartment building with a special account avoid making wrong decisions by the general meeting, due to which funds from the special account are subsequently spent inappropriately or not for the work that is determined by the regional program for the near term , there is a threat of loss of funds in the special account and the special account itself, if the overhaul work is not completed within the prescribed period.

The thematic video consultation was prepared as part of the project "My renovated house, my landscaped yard, my comfortable area: supporting residents' initiatives", implemented with the support of the Committee for Public Relations and Youth Policy of the city of Moscow.

Watch the following thematic video consultations in May.

Possible errors in making decisions on the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account

The owners of the premises are responsible for the conduct of the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account [1]. Only the owners of premises in such houses are entitled and obliged to make decisions on carrying out major repairs and using for this purpose the funds of the capital repairs fund formed on a special account. No one else can take these decisions for the owners as long as the owners continue to implement the method of forming a capital repair fund on a special account.

What decisions are made by the owners of the premises, to what extent they comply with the requirements of the law, as well as the interests of the owners, largely depends on the person submitting the proposal for major repairs to the owners. Such a person must be an organization that manages an apartment building, and may be one of the owners of premises in an apartment building [2] (for example, the council of an apartment building) (hereinafter referred to as the initiator of the overhaul). The decisions of the owners depend on what proposals the initiator of the overhaul puts to a vote at the general meeting. Recently there have been cases where0003 as a result of incorrect decisions taken by the general meeting at the suggestion of the initiator of the overhaul, funds from the special account are spent inappropriately or not for those works that are determined by the regional program for the near term, etc. Ultimately, creates a threat to the owners of the funds in the special account and the special account itself, if the major repairs are not completed on time, planned by the regional program.

Let's see why the decisions of the owners may be wrong, not in line with the requirements of the law.

Capital repair services and works for which funds from a special account can be used, formed from capital repair contributions in the established minimum amount, are determined by part 1 of article 166 of the Housing Code. This is:

1) repair of in-house engineering systems of electricity, heat, gas, water supply, sanitation;

2) repair or replacement of elevator equipment recognized as unsuitable for operation, repair of elevator shafts;

3) roof repairs;

4) repair of basements belonging to common property in an apartment building;

5) facade repair;

6) repair of the foundation of an apartment building.

In addition to this list, the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, by its regulatory legal act, may determine other services and major repairs that can be financed from the funds from contributions in the minimum amount [4].

The list of overhaul services and works to be voted on must contain only those services and works that are included in the approved lists of services and works. Other services and major repairs can only be carried out at the expense of additional contributions or other funds [5].

All these established lists of works relate specifically to overhaul (replacement) of engineering systems or structures of an apartment building, and not their individual parts, which can be brought into proper condition during maintenance .

Error - under the guise of a major overhaul, make a decision on work related to the current repair.

An example of an incorrect decision:

"Approve the list of services and works on overhaul:

1. Repair (replacement) of shut-off and control valves on heating risers.

2. Repair of elevators (winch, rope, pulley)

3. Repair of asphalt pavement

4. Replacement of parking doors."

The owners of the premises pay for the current repair of the common property to the managing organization as part of the payment for the residential premises.

Recommendations to the initiator of the overhaul:

1. Prepare information for the owners of the premises on what overhaul works and in what time frame are provided for in relation to the apartment building by the regional capital overhaul program.

2. If the proposal for major repairs does not include any work (work), provided for by the regional program for the nearest period, the initiator of the overhaul must provide the owners with a justification why there is no need to carry out this work within the time period established by the program, and include in the agenda of the general meeting the issue of postponing the deadline for such work to later period (indicating such period). Such a decision of the general meeting is necessary to make changes to the regional overhaul program [6].

3. In order to avoid problems with determining the targeted nature of spending funds from a special account, it is desirable in the proposal for a major overhaul and in the decision of the general meeting to name services and works as they are named in the Housing Code and the regulatory legal act of the subject of the Russian Federation .

4. Indicate the scope of work so that there is no doubt that this is work of a capital nature, relating to the entire system (construction).

The fact that a proposal for a major overhaul must contain a proposal not only on the required list, but also on the scope of services and (or) works, is indicated in part 3 of Article 189 of the Housing Code.

5. In the voting ballot, provide for the possibility of making a decision ("for", "against", "abstained") for each service, work included in the proposed list, so that the owners do not vote against the entire list, if in fact they are against just one job.

6. If necessary, a question about the performance of services and work on major repairs that are not included in the approved lists of services and works that can be financed from the funds from the minimum contributions for major repairs, and the source of funding for such services and works ( additional contributions, income from the use of common property, etc.) is recommended to be included in the agenda of the general meeting as a separate item .

Recommendations for owners of premises who received a proposal for a major overhaul:

1. To ensure there is no doubt later that the owners carried out major repairs provided for by the regional program, check , which major repairs in relation to the apartment building are defined in the regional capital repair program , the short-term plan for the implementation of the regional program, matches whether the list of works provided for by the regional program for the next period with the list contained in the proposal for a major overhaul.

The owners of the premises do not have the opportunity to exclude from the list any work that the regional program has established as mandatory (unless it is proved that the building does not have those structures or engineering systems, the overhaul of which is erroneously planned in the regional program [7]) .

2. If the proposed list of services and works differs from that established by the regional program , the short-term plan for the implementation of the regional program, carefully look at the justification , which is submitted by the initiator of the overhaul to the proposal for a list, the timing of the overhaul.

3. If the initiator of the overhaul does not provide a justification for the proposal to carry out the overhaul a, contact him with questions (request) so that the decision you will make is based on objective information. If possible, inform other owners of premises in the house that no supporting information has been provided to make a decision.

For the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account, the norm of the Housing Code on the marginal cost of services and works for overhaul, determined by the regulatory legal act of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, is not applied. The marginal cost is set only for the regional operator [9]. Owners of premises in a house with a special account can pay more for work than a regional operator if they want the best, more reliable and durable building materials and engineering equipment to be used. However, when deciding on the cost of an upcoming major overhaul, owners of premises in an apartment building need to understand what the amount put up for voting is based on. Doesn't their decision create an opportunity to overestimate the cost of a major overhaul without improving its quality in comparison with the repair carried out by the regional operator.

Recommendations to the initiator of the overhaul:

1. Provide justification on this issue, for example, information on the marginal cost of similar works established for the regional operator, on the study of the repair work market, on price offers or estimates for the work of potential contractors ( several contractors, not just one!), about the cost of equipment from different manufacturers, indicating the characteristics of the equipment, etc.

2. There is no clear requirement in the legislation that the marginal cost should be determined for each service and each major overhaul. Therefore, the total cost of all services and works included in the list for the upcoming repair can be put to the vote. This allows, if necessary, to reallocate funds between works, if, according to the results of the selection of contractors, one work turned out to be somewhat cheaper, and another more expensive than expected.

3. Since market prices may change by the time the contract(s) for the execution of works is concluded, a small reserve may be provided for in the marginal cost of capital repairs proposed for voting . In justifying the proposal on the issue of the marginal cost of capital repairs, it is recommended to indicate the size of this reserve (in percent).

Recommendations for owners of premises who received a proposal for a major overhaul:

1. Compare the cost of the overhaul works specified in the proposal of the initiator of the overhaul with the marginal cost of similar services and works established for the regional operator.

2. Carefully review the rationale provided by the overhaul proponent for the overhaul cost proposal.

3. If the initiator of the overhaul does not provide justification for the proposal on the cost of the overhaul a, contact him with questions (request) so that the decision you will make is based on the information received. If possible, inform other homeowners that no supporting information has been provided to make a decision.

According to part 3 of article 189 of the Housing Code, a proposal for a major overhaul must contain proposal on the start date for the overhaul .

Owners of premises in an apartment building with a special account have the right to carry out major repairs earlier than the deadline established by the regional program, but not later than the deadline, since the program sets a deadline for their implementation. The consequence of failure to carry out major repairs (separate major repairs) within the time period established by the regional program is a change in the method of formation of the capital repairs fund by the local government (authorized state authority in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sevastopol) - transfer of an apartment building , funds from a special account to the regional operator.

Error - not to take into account the timeframe for the overhaul work established by the regional program, to make an unreasonable decision to carry out work scheduled for a later date, to the detriment of work scheduled for an earlier date.

Recommendations to the initiator of the overhaul:

1. The proposal for the list of works and the timing of their implementation should be based on the regional program of the overhaul. First of all, the issue of carrying out the work planned by the regional program for the near future should be considered.

It is recommended to indicate in the proposal on the term of the overhaul the work period established by the regional program (for reference) and the reason for the work to be performed at an earlier (later) date.

2. If there is no need to carry out any work within the time period stipulated by the regional program, it is recommended to include the issue of postponing such work to a later date (period) in the agenda of the general meeting as a separate item. The proposal to postpone the deadline must be substantiated by an act of assessing the technical condition of the engineering system (structure), containing a conclusion that there is no need to carry it out within the period specified in the program and a recommendation on the timing of the overhaul.

3. A proposal for an earlier date for carrying out any work (including such work in the list of necessary services and works) must be justified by the technical condition of the engineering system (structure) and (or) the need to perform simultaneously with other work (other works) according to overhaul [11], provided for by the regional program for the upcoming earlier period.

Recommendations for owners of premises who received a proposal for a major overhaul:

1. Compare the timeframe for the major repair work specified in the proposal of the major repair initiator with the timeframe provided for these works in your home by the regional program.

2. Carefully look at the justification , which is submitted by the initiator of the overhaul to the proposal on the timing of the proposed overhaul.

3. If the initiator of the overhaul does not provide justification for the proposal on the timing of the overhaul , contact him with questions (request) so that the decision you will make is based on the information received. If possible, inform other homeowners that no supporting information has been provided to make a decision.

Capital repairs are financed from the capital repairs fund formed on a special account. If, apart from these funds, other sources of funding are envisaged, they should be indicated in the proposal on this issue.

Recommendations to the overhaul initiator:

1. Provide owners with information on the size of the overhaul fund , formed on a special account (and which will be formed by the end of the repair), so that the amount of funds available to the owners at the time of making decisions on the overhaul can be compared with its cost.

2. In the event that the funds on the special account are not enough to finance the overhaul, include in the proposal for the overhaul specific proposals for attracting a credit (loan) or concluding a contract with the condition of installment payment for the completed repair.

3. Include proposals for raising borrowed funds for major repairs in the agenda of the general meeting as separate issues put to a vote.

Recommendations to owners of premises who received a proposal for a major overhaul:

2. Carefully review the loan proposal submitted by the proponent of the overhaul.

3. If the cost of the overhaul proposed by the initiator is greater than the amount of funds in the special account, and the proposal for the overhaul does not contain specific proposals on the sources of the missing funds, contact the overhaul initiator with questions (request) to resolve, which you will accept, based on the information received. If possible, inform other owners of premises in the house that the necessary information is not provided to make a decision.

  • Fifth question on the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account, on which the owners of the premises at the general meeting must decide - on a person who, on behalf of all owners of the premises in the apartment building, is authorized to participate in the acceptance of services rendered and (or ) completed work on major repairs, including signing the relevant acts [13].

Unlike houses, the overhaul of which is carried out by a regional operator, who also forms an acceptance commission consisting of representatives of various bodies and organizations, as well as a representative of the owners authorized by the decision of the general meeting [14], for an apartment building with a special account, the question of the formation of a commission for the acceptance of services performed and major repairs is not regulated. Since proposals for the overhaul of an apartment building with a special account, in accordance with the requirement of the Housing Code, must be made by the organization managing the apartment building, it is quite often proposed in the proposals of the initiator of the overhaul to provide just such an organization to be the representative of all owners of the premises when accepting work.

If the organization managing an apartment building is a homeowners' association or a housing, housing-construction cooperative, then the board of such an organization consists of the owners of the premises. Therefore, it is quite acceptable to choose an HOA or a housing cooperative as a representative of the owners.

Mistake - to choose as a representative of all the owners of the premises, authorized to participate in the acceptance of services and works on major repairs and sign acts, the managing organization.

With this decision, "participate in acceptance" would actually mean "accept". The management organization and the owners may take different interests and opinions regarding the quality of the repair. If the managing organization is the person concluding contracts for the performance of major repairs, then the decision to make it also the sole representative of the owners of the owners of the premises, carrying out the acceptance, means creating a conflict of interest.

And if at the same time the managing organization is also the owner of the special account, then the decision of the owners to choose it as their representative for the acceptance of work actually allows the managing organization to order, accept works and use the funds of the special account without control.

Recommendations to property owners who have received a proposal for major repairs:

1. Elect a representative of all owners to accept major repairs from among the owners .

Although the Housing Code specifies the need to designate one person representing all the owners of the premises, the general meeting may be asked to appoint several persons to participate in the acceptance of works as elected representatives of the owners of the premises, including in the event that one of the authorized persons will not be able to take part in the work of the acceptance committee.

2. A committee of owners may be elected to assist the elected representative of the owners premises for the acceptance of major repairs from among the owners with the necessary qualifications and experience.

The possibility of electing (by a decision of the general meeting or council of an apartment building) commissions of owners of premises "to prepare proposals on certain issues related to the management of an apartment building" is provided for by the Housing Code [15].

3. Think about who will be on the commission for the acceptance of the completed overhaul so that the interests of the owners are represented and protected.

The Commission for the acceptance of services rendered and work performed on capital repairs of an apartment building, in addition to an elected representative of the owners, may include a person involved by the owners of the premises to exercise construction control over the performance of capital repairs, and an organization managing the apartment building. In the case of acceptance of work on the replacement of elevators, gas supply systems, organizations that carry out maintenance of these in-house engineering systems can also be involved in the acceptance of work.

[1] See part 1 of article 168 of the RF LC: "The regional program for the overhaul of common property in apartment buildings determines the deadlines for the owners of premises in such buildings and (or) the regional operator to overhaul apartment buildings ".

[2] See Parts 2 and 3 of Article 189 of the LC RF.

[3] See paragraph 1 of part 5.1 of Article 189 of the LC RF.

[4] See Part 2 of Article 166 of the LC RF.

[5] See Part 3 of Article 166, Part 4 of Article 169 of the LC RF.

[6] See Part 4 of Article 168 of the LC RF.

[7] See paragraph 1 of part 4 of Article 168 of the HC RF.

[8] See paragraph 2 of part 5.1 of Article 189 of the LC RF.

[9] See Part 4 of Article 189 of the LC RF.

[10] See clause 3 of part 5.1 of Article 189 of the RF LC.

[11] See paragraph 3 of part 2 of Article 168 of the LC RF.

[12] See paragraph 4 of part 5.1 of article 189 of the LC RF.

[13] See clause 5 of part 5.1 of Article 189 of the LC RF.

[14] See clause 5 of part 2 of Article 182 of the RF LC.

[15] See parts 11 and 12 of Article 161.1 of the HC RF.

Region:

Russian Federation

The list of courtyards that will be renovated in Yaroslavl this year has become known - Yarreg

A preliminary

list of

106 territories has appeared that are going to

improve

in Yaroslavl within the framework of the governor's project. This project was discussed at a meeting of the working group via videoconference.

“This is a large-scale project that is being implemented in a very short time frame. And in order to make it qualitatively, it is necessary to monitor each stage of implementation. The progress of work will be monitored on a daily basis. Every day is important, as well as a clear understanding of the work schedule for each municipality,” Mikhail Evraev, Acting Governor of the Yaroslavl Region, emphasized.

As part of the project, asphalt will be repaired, parking and pedestrian areas will be arranged, landscaping will be carried out, sports and children's play equipment will be installed in the yards. Now standard versions of the sites are being developed, after which they will be presented to the residents. But not only they will have to give their assessment of sports and gaming complexes. Particular attention of the meeting participants was drawn to the fact that the entire improvement program should be implemented with the direct participation of residents.

“Now the preliminary list is formed from 106 objects. The next stage is the discussion of future repairs with residents. Its start will be given in Yaroslavl, because it is in our city that the largest number of yards will be improved. Residents will become full participants in the project. I note that the wishes of the residents will be of paramount importance during the improvement. Each yard will be under control, all objects must be completed with strict adherence to deadlines, design estimates and proper quality,” Vladimir Volkov said.

To date, design solutions are ready for more than 60 yard areas. After completion of this stage of work, the cost of repairs for each yard will be determined. The identification of contractors must be completed by May 1. After that, they will go to the objects.

List of households by regions:

Zavolzhsky district

Almaznaya st., 5, 5 bld. 2
Krasnoborskaya st., 5, building 2, 7, 7a
Panfilova st., 19, 21, 21 bld. 2, Lebedeva st., 1
Rannyaya st., 12
Rannyaya st., 14, Lebedeva st., 5
Almaznaya st. , 5, 5 bldg. 2
Lyapidevsky St., 15, 19, 21, Mashinostroiteley Ave., 16a
Mashinostroiteley Ave., 2, 4, 10
S. Ordzhonikidze St., d. 6, d. 8 bldg. 2
S. Ordzhonikidze St., 33, 35
Aviatorov Ave, 104 bld. 2, 102
Mashinostroiteley avenue, 13 building 2 2
Mashinostroiteley Ave., 36, 38, 38 bldg. 2, d. 38 bldg. 3, 40, 42
Saukova st., 7, 9
Shkolny proezd, 10 bldg. 2, 12, Mashinostroiteley Ave, 19/14
Sakharova st., 5, 1
Sakharova st., 19, 21, 23
Krasnoborskaya st., d. 48, building 48 2
Tsvetochnaya st., 1a, 2a, 3a, 5a, 3b, 5b (Urochskaya st., 22, 25, 27, 29, 31)

Dzerzhinsky district

Leningradsky avenue, 78
Leningradsky avenue, 80
Leningradsky avenue, 82
st. Balashova, d. 16 building 2, st. Kuropatkova, d. 68
4th Norsky lane, 2 building 2
st. Babich, 11 building 3, 11 building 2
Leningradsky avenue, 58, 60 2, d. 60 bldg. 3
Leningradsky prospect, d, 56/18, st. Panina, 16
st. Panina, 7, Leningradsky pr-t, 93, 95
st. Builders, d. 1, d. 1 bldg. 3, d. 1 building. 4
st. Tumanova, 4a
Dzerzhinsky avenue, 8, bld. 2, d. 8 bldg. 3
Dzerzhinsky Ave., 10, bld. 10 2, d. 10 bldg. 3
Leningradsky Prospekt, 60 bldg. 5, d. 62 bldg. 3, d. 62 bldg. 4, d. 62 bldg. 5
st. Gromova, 42, 44
st. Panina, d.54
st. Trufanova, d. 22 bldg. 2, d. 22 bldg. 3
st. Volgogradskaya, 55, 57
st. Trufanova, d. 29 bldg. 5
Dzerzhinsky Ave, 26, 30
st. Gromova, 16, 18, 20
st. E. Kolesovoy, 72, 78
st. Trufanova, 10, Dzerzhinsky Ave., 34
st. A. Nevsky, 11
st. Pionerskaya, d. 1, 3, st. Uritskogo, d. 24
st. Uritskogo, 46, 48
st. Pionerskaya, 21, 23
Tutaevskoe shosse, 43, 45
Shavyrina proezd, 25, 26, 28

Kirovsky district Pobedy, d. 19
st. B. Oktyabrskaya, 73
st. City Val, 10, 12
st. Chekhov, 37, st. Uglichskaya, 29, 31
st. S.-Shchedrin, d. 83, st. City Val, 9
Tolbukhin Ave. , 17a, 17/65
st. B. Oktyabrskaya, 81, 83/10
st. Sverdlova, 31, 33

Krasnoperekopsky district

st. Zelinsky, 2, 4, st. Pavlova, d. 11, st. Gagarina, 39
st. Neftchinikov, d. 27
st. Pavlova, d. 4, st. Institutskaya, 11
st. Titova, d. 29, st. Neftchinikov, 20, st. Rykacheva, 17
st. Neftchinikov, d. 23
st. Rykacheva, 18
st. Malanova, 19, 21
st. March 8, d. 2, st. Krasnoperekopskaya, 19
st. March 8, d. 12a
st. Krasnoperekopskaya, 12, 14, st. Semashko, 11, 15
st. March 8, d. 21, d. 21, bldg. 2
st. Stachek, d. 55

Leninsky district

st. Uglichskaya, 44
Lenin Ave., 23 bldg. 2, 25
Lenin Ave., 29/51, st. Volodarsky, d. 105
st. Uglichskaya, 26, 28
st. Chkalova, d. 23, d. 23 bldg. 2, building 25, building 25 2, st. Zhukova, d. 25, d. 27 bldg. 2
st. R. Luxembourg, 32, st. Chkalova, 21, 21a, 23a,
Lermontov st., 44, 44a, Zhukova st., 29
st. Belinsky, 34, 34a, st.

Learn more